Operational, 504 MW
|Timber Rd. I||Paulding||38||(1)|
|Timber Rd. II||Paulding||99||(1)|
|Timber Rd. III||Paulding||63||(1)|
Under Construction, 466 MW
Approved, 766 MW
Planned, 670-680 MW
|Long Prairie||Van Wert||450||(4)|
AEP and DPl have also announced plans for up to 800 MW of wind (5-7). Small wind installations add 43 MW (8)
(1) D. Gearino, ‘Different spins’, Columbus Dispatch, Sept. 24, 2017
(2) “Exelon to build its first commercial wind farm in Ohio”, Platts, 21 June 2016
(3) LEEDCo Vision and Timing http://www.leedco.org/icebreaker/vision-timeline, accessed 2 October 2017
(4) “Commissioners meet with wind farm representatives”, Times Bulletin, 3 Feb 2016
(5)”AEP renewable-power proposal ambitious, costly”, Columbus Dispatch, 16 Dec. 2015
(6) “AEP wants to hear from wind developers interested in big Ohio projects”, Columbus Business Journal, May 13, 2016
(7) “DP&L agrees to invest in clean energy; signaling agreement to retire Stuart and Killen coal plants”, Sierra Club Press Release, 30 January 2017
(8) “Small wind turbines in Ohio are the next big thing, says Department of Energy” http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2017/08/small_wind_turbines_in_ohio_ar_1.html, August 11, 2017
Shale jobs have been decreasing for several years. According to the latest data, there were only about half as many core jobs, such as drilling and pipeline construction, as there were three years earlier (1). At under 10,000, job creation is a small fraction of the Chamber of Commerce prediction of 60,000 (2)
Only part of the difference between prediction and reality can be attributed to auxiliary jobs, such as truck driving. Since Jobs and Family Services (1) only has the total number of truck drivers, they assign those drivers to shale jobs, even the unknown number working for FedEX and other companies. Therefore the tens of thousands reported auxiliary jobs (1) are likely to be greatly exaggerated.
(1) Ohio Department of Jobs and Family Services, Ohio Shale Quarterly Reports, http://ohiolmi.com/OhioShale/OhioShale.htm, accessed 21 April 2017.
(2) Ohio Chamber of Commerce Educational Foundation; Economic Potential for Shale Formations in Ohio, n. d.
There are still office holders who cling to the notion of expensive renewable energy, buttressed by questionable web sites.
There is a line of argument that I have not seen used: companies, such as Google and Amazon, have made major commitments to renewable energy. These are publically-traded firms. If renewable energy was so expensive, Wall Street would be shouting loudly and hammering their stock down. This has not happened.
Update of 12 Sept. 2015 posting:
The following quote from the latest Ohio shale jobs survey makes one wonder why the state is pushing shale and discouraging renewables, which provide many more jobs:
“Employment (2011 Q4 to 2014 Q4) … • Core shale-related industry employment (such as pipeline construction and well drilling) was up 7,207 (96.6 percent). • Ancillary shale-related industry employment (such as freight trucking and environmental consulting) increased 8,463 (5.0 percent)”.(a)
Comment: Total shale jobs created since the end of 2010 is 20,064, which is far short of the Chamber of Commerce prediction of 65,680.(b) At the same time there are 89,000 green energy jobs in the state(c) – over four times as many and up 58,000 since 2012(d).
(a) Ohio Department of Job and Family Services; Ohio Shale, Quarterly Economic Trends for Ohio Oil and Gas Industries, July 2015;
(b) Ohio Chamber of Commerce Educational Foundation; Economic Potential for Shale Formations in Ohio, n. d.
(c) Environmental Entrepreneurs; “Clean Jobs Ohio”, May 2015;
(d) State of Ohio, Ohio Alternative Energy Job Survey Analysis February 2013, http://www.lwvohio.org/assets/attachments/file/ODSA%20job%20survey%20(1).pdf
There is concern that the proposed AEP solar construction in SE Ohio will occupy too much land. At 75kW per sq. ft., the 400 MW project will occupy about one sq. mi. SE Ohio has plenty of potential sites (e.g. parking lots) and much vacant land. There should be no problem.
The table shows that fuel prices for electric generation have been declining the past few years. Fuel costs cannot explain the rise in electric bills.
|Fuel||PercentX||Cost, $/BTUX||% Drop in cost|
|Jan. 2009||Peak since 2009||Current
|Since 2009||Since Peak|
|Coal||67||2.30||2.49 (Feb. 2012)||2.12||8||15|
|Natural Gas||18||6.30||7.33 (Jan. 2010)||2.19||65||70|
X: Percent of Ohio electricity provided by each fuel in 2014. Energy Information Administration reports costs in terms of energy per dollar to facilitate comparison (1).
(1) Energy Information Administration, Electric Data Browser, http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/